With that wonderment which is the birth-act of philosophy, I suddenly start to query the familiar.
(Konrad Lorenz, 1952)

Saturday, June 12, 2010

Irony we don’t need; Freedom we don’t want


Note: if you are not an animal person you may not understand; also, please know that Keely and I don’t have children so Neenah was truly our daughter. She made a couple into The Family.

The world is replete with cruel ironies, and yesterday when Neenah passed away, my wife and I experienced a hammer-to-the-head blow of irony. We had brought Neenah in for a routine check-up. She had experienced a little diarrhea over the past month and her hips were stiff; she was an old lady at sixteen but healthy. The vet had finished his initial exam and said she was in good shape. When he took her back to get a blood and stool sample–nothing odd there and something she had experienced before–Keely and I talked of plans we could make in light of Neenah’s health. We had returned to the States partially to give her a “retirement” somewhere safe and easy; not that she didn’t have it relatively safe and easy everywhere we took her, but psychologically we thought it best to ease back on travel in her golden years.

We realized she was just trucking along and our attention to her health over the years had kept her in great shape. So, we started talking of bringing her abroad again or even being able to handle living in a cabin in a remote section of Ecuador.

Healthy and in a safe place with a good vet doing a routine blood draw, she got scared, then had a seizure that we think led to a stroke. She never came back. We were right there hoping she would come out of the catatonic state she had fallen into–her eyes were open and widely dilated and her gums and tongue so pale we knew there was a circulation issue. Her heart was fine but her respirations shallow and erratic (she was intubated to help). She never came back. We called to her, stroked her, pinched her but she never came back. After forty-five minutes we realized that even if somehow she came out of that horrible state she would no longer be the same Neenah, her brain affected by a stroke and/or a serious lack of oxygen. We made the decision then to euthanize her.

We expected some illness to take her some time, and for the two of us to have to make a long, hard decision. That would’ve been a painful situation but one that we controlled. We couldn’t control this lightning quick descent.

An hour earlier we were planning our day with a casualness that now seems awful: after the vets we’ll drop Neenah off then go do errands, then maybe the beach. We couldn’t see a day without Neenah. We never have had a time without her.

Classic Irony heard us speaking of Neenah’s health and our plans of new freedoms and decided such hubris would not stand. Point taken Irony but fuck you anyway.

We don’t want the freedom we now have. Hey we can now take that six-month job cataloging a bird species in some remote area, way off the grid and requiring backcountry living and self-reliance. Fuck that too. I’d take this cushy suburban apartment and a mediocre day-to-day life over anything else, as long as we could have the ability to hear her wake us up every morning and greet us every afternoon.

We don't want this new freedom we have.

Friday, June 11, 2010

Our Love Neenah


R.I.P. Neenah Marie Bargnesi-Cronin (1994-2010). The prettiest, most mellow, most well-traveled cat anyone has ever seen. Our daughter. Keely and I got Neenah when we started dating in the summer of 1994 and she was with us since then. Wherever we went in the world, whatever we were doing it was the three of us--The Family. She died unexpectedly this morning sending Keely and I into major shock and grief. The apartment will be too big without her. We loved her.

Saturday, May 29, 2010

PLAY!

In the last three days I’ve hiked, canoed, climbed, square-danced, done parkour, poked around in mountain creeks, skim boarded on the shore, “porpoised” in the ocean (more later on this), and just walked about having fun.

These are things I’ve done before (except the square dancing—insanely fun!), most of them done usually with intensity and with a serious bent. But more and more I’ve come around to the idea of playing as the most intense, yet non-serious, activity one can do.

Yeah, I know this is nothing new.

First, I was away on the SC-NC border, up in the mountains at 3100 feet, for a school fieldtrip. Try dealing with 105 thirteen year-olds and you will know what it takes to “Work Out.” Yet, for me, I seemed to build energy the more we did. Away from the classroom and the normal boundaries, I felt more alive.

Now, I got a little beat up on the trip but in a good way. Outdoor stuff is my fortĂ© so I felt at home, but having been out of it for a while my muscles were weak. The lesson? It doesn’t matter how much time in the gym you spend, real life activity works you differently. I’ve been living in the Lowcountry and we were up in the mountains so I was huffing and puffing a little.

One thing that really tweaked my fitness was playing around with kids who were starting to get into parkour (check it out). I had been doing stuff like that way back before it was ever had a name. So some kids were jumping off stuff, leaping, bouncing, etc. The mountain air must have charged me up enough to want to show the kids how to do it. I showed them that I could out jump, climb, swing, and bounce all of them. I don’t say this out of arrogance, because by doing that I established credentials that I could use to gain their trust and enthusiasm to try new things and appreciate the outdoors or at least appreciate the spirit of physical daring (parkour is not about the outdoors/the wild but I tried to turn it that way).

Even now, my right shoulder is a little tweaked because of particular move I kept trying to perfect, in which I leapt up a flagstone chimney wall and then rotated outward on my right hand, spinning back towards a further section of the wall with my left hand to land again. I never perfected it but damn it was great.

I came home from the trip on Friday night super tired (trying sleeping in the same cabin as fifteen 13 year boys who keep making fart noises!) and thought I was done for the weekend; however, this morning my wife and I went to the beach, like we always do, and there was no way I could avoid skim-boarding since the conditions were perfect. Like begets like. Once started, I felt the same energy I did in the mountains. Tweaked muscles and schwagged-out brain were banished once I started to skim and spin across the inch thin water. I was better today than I’ve ever been.

I’ve been slowly discovering the stuff I used to do all the time twenty-plus years ago. Somewhere between then and now certain aspects were lost or minimalized. Glad to be back.

Mark Sisson, author of The Primal Blueprint and the Blog Mark’s Daily Apple talks of play as a part of his plan for a healthy and happy life. And Erwan Le Corre of MovNat has a whole movement related to working out in nature, something many of us have been doing for awhile, or used to do back in the day, but didn’t have the foresight or confidence to put out there as a full movement.

Do I have any issues with these guys? Nope. Sisson is right on but could link the play more directly to the other aspects of his plan and Le Corre just needs to lighten up a little on the intensity, just like me (hey Erwan, Boulder’s more fun when you play and party!).

I want to extend the idea of play (for myself really since I know this is already going on). For example, when the Primal Blueprint talks of sprinting every seven to ten days, it is something I can’t disagree with, but I wonder if we couldn’t get those sprints in some other way. I thought of this idea this morning when I was skim-boarding with some intensity for about a half-hour. I realized that I had been sprinting for quite a while, every time I bolted after the board to jump on it. Was it a full fifty-yard sprint? Of course not. The difference? It was a shorter sprint but was then combined with balance and core strength. Most important was that it was fun and on the shore and not isolated like so many exercises are—it wasn’t just exercise, it was life, and it wasn’t just life but great living!

The idea is that one plays first and worries about fitness results second.

All of us need to play first.

Wednesday, May 12, 2010

Rekindling myself and giving thanks

I started this blog to examine myself and catch fire again--rekindle energy. Well the blog hasn't helped but I think life itself has rekindled in fits and starts; that is, some weeks are better than others and some endeavors are sticking fast.

So I want to review some memory laden, chronological nonsense to put my life in a little bit of perspective:

Twenty years ago last weekend I graduated college. Ten years ago this summer, Keely and I moved overseas for the first time to Sao Paulo, Brasil. Wow!

From 1990 to 2000 I managed to do the following (in semi-chronological order):
Travelled and worked around the States and then the World (too much stuff to list).
Ended up in Boulder, CO, where I would meet Keely, keep traveling (especially to New Guinea, Cuba, and around the West), got a Masters, and then fell into Education as a profession.
Made astounding new friendships and partied my ass off in Boulder.
Taught in Oakland, CA and really got tested as an educator. Plus the Bay Area is a great place to experience. Got to hang with my brother Matt and his family too!

From 2000 to 2010:
Moved to Brasil, first Sao Paulo and then Rio. Five years there! Our second home and one I would move back to at the drop of a hat (there is too much about Brasil to write about now).
Made important and lifelong friends there.
Really started writing: had a few things published and wrote two novels (third one underway and is the charm)
Rediscovered my love of the wild and my talent at outdoors stuff.
Lived in Florida where Keely's talent took off.
Trained as Wilderness EMT at one of the best programs in the world.
Lived in Europe! Hey, being able to fly to Paris for the weekend or take a train up to Prague ain't bad. And visits to the motherland of Italy didn't hurt either.
Lived in Tanzania. Now this time was rough for Keely and I but the things we experienced, the new tight friends we made, and the connection to the wildlife was outstanding.

And here I am in a beautiful part of the States, the Lowcountry of South Carolina. Not a permanent home but a cool place to be for a while. The forests and swamps + beach + Charleston = a great interlude. Plus Keely has moved to yet another level of her very rare and yet important career. I honestly think there are very few in the world with her level of expertise and competence. The great raptors of the world thank her!

So, I give thanks and praise.

Diarrhea of the Pen

Yeah, I haven't been successful with this blog but that's okay--it is a work in progress and will evolve. I've been talking to my friend Jeremy and I'm hoping he will jump on this blog and add some things that are related to rekindling life and energy and all that. Anyway, why so reticent to blog? Anyone who really knows me knows that I have plenty to say about everything and anything, so that ain't it.

I think it comes down to the fact that I'm not enamored by the form and the idea that one should blog a lot about whatever. Also I feel guilty about writing some puff piece just to say I've written it. Over and over, blog experts say you should write about what you know. Yes but write well about what you know well. I don't want to add another mediocre piece to the blog pile. I find this especially true with travel/adventure/outdoors stuff. I keep hearing I should write about that yet most of that stuff I see on the blogs is the same old shit rehashed and embellished. I won't do it!

Let me be honest too--I think there is the typical Cronin arrogance at work. On one of the adventure travel sites, someone will write their top ten things to do in Cuba after having been there for whole two weeks. I read that and then say, "Shit, I went there multiple times, lived in a regular Havana neighborhood, and experienced quite a bit that is off the radar." Yet even in that arrogance that I know more, I still think I don't know enough to really do it justice--it all comes off so contrived.

And there it is, a lot of blogs and daily blogging comes off as contrived. So I struggle with it. I know I need to do, expose myself, etc. but damn it is hard work trying not to write contrived bullshit.

So this has been just one big diarrhea of the pen.

Wednesday, March 24, 2010

Five to Teach

Haven't blogged in a while because I had nothing to say and I didn't want to babble. I'm a bad blogger. I currently teach 7th grade Language Arts, so I'm not teaching the advanced stuff I'm used to. So, I started thinking about five literary works I like to teach (and read). So here they are, in no particular order of importance:

The Things They Carried by Tim O'Brien: never met a teen that didn't like this collection of interwoven short stories about Vietnam and its aftermath. Not only powerful and vivid and realistic, but a great resource to really show the author's craft. Need to really show why syntax is an important device that can carry theme? Use this. Need to discuss metafiction? Use this. I could go on.

One Flew over the Cuckoo's Nest by Ken Kesey. There is a reason this is taught so often--its theme of rebellion and sacrifice resonates with most. Like O'Brien's collection, the novel is well-suited to showing young readers and writers the author's craft. I love the movie and always show it after the kids have read the book, and they all say the book is far, far better.

The Wasteland by T.S. Eliot: The poster child for complexity and for intimidating even the highest level students. Many don't like it even after they have fully digested it but damn it they respect it. It's like running a marathon or climbing a mountain. Sometimes it doesn't have to be fun to be fun. And you know what? Everyone should know the Fisher King motif!

Poems by Emily Dickinson: See first sentence about Eliot; however, many students come around to loving her style and her complete control of language while expressing the sublime. I like pairing Eliot and Dickinson to demonstrate opposing ways of writing, and then I watch the students' heads spin.

The Sailor who Fell from Grace with the Sea by Yukio Mishima. A work in translation, and the translation is so good, so well-crafted, that I can't imagine how good the original Japanese novel is. This work is very disturbing, puts the kids on edge, and yet has them determined to really delve into the symbolism, diction, and narrative technique.

So, there you go.

Wednesday, February 17, 2010

Ambivalence and Blog Tautology

Since I started this blog, I've read lots of advice/how-to columns on blogging. Lots of good advice, but I've failed to follow some (or most?) of it. First, the idea of blogging everyday is great but I can't pull it off. I actually become guilty when I'm about to write some crap just to write something. A few weeks ago I almost took the bait and submitted a piece of writing about expat life to a blog that was looking for writers. Why didn't I? Well I started reading that blog and the related blogs that all feed off of one another. What did I discover? The writing was mediocre, and worse there were far too many articles that were "slapdash" (thanks, Izzard, for the term). By that I mean the writer just wanted to publish something and post it on his/her site, and then have it linked to another site that linked back to the original site (blog tautology). Many of these blogs are lists/top tens and they say nothing. A recent one I read discussed the top ten new eco-adventures for 2010 (or something like that). This area I can speak with expertise: the adventures weren't new, the descriptions were prosaic, and the accompanying pictures were stock photos. But hey, the blogger fulfilled the "publish no matter what" ethos.

The publish no matter what and publish quickly ethos results in sloppy writing, which of course reflects sloppy thinking. More, it reflects a self-satisfaction on the part of the writer that can be dangerous: "Hey, I'm writing and my blog is followed so therefore I am legitimate and my writing has weight." I question this about myself and others.

And where does that leave me? I've started doing this to kick start my writing, my self-examination, and to dabble in new media. However, does this sort of writing and the time it takes up really serve me well? I don't know. So for now I am ambivalent on blogging as a form and where it will take me, and whether I want to take me anywhere.

Monday, February 8, 2010

Hard Thoughts and a "Hard Sun"

I’m feeling pretty good lately; I have been since late summer. Nevertheless I want to revisit a time, a little more than a year ago, when I was pretty damn miserable and experiencing one wave of a multi-wave mid-life crisis. My mid-life crisis has never been strictly about mortality; it falls into the camp of choices I never made or things I have yet to do. That may seem strange to friends and family who would say I’ve sometimes gone overboard trying to see the world, have adventures, and live fully. Still, I can be a malcontent and I am not satisfied with my achievements (or lack of).

I do this to shine a light upon myself, and the world around me, so I can rekindle the sparks of my life. So, onto last’s year’s misery:

Eddie Vedder’s song “Hard Sun” and its direct association with Into the Wild provoked it. I had read the original story at the time it appeared in Outside magazine (Jan 1993) when I was living in Boulder, and I read the book when it was published. I watched the movie last year when it came out, but it was the song itself that, coupled with my renewed interest in those events of eighteen years ago, drew something out of me. The lyrics of the song speak directly to me, and the simple yet stirring music doesn’t hurt either. I won’t analyze the song here, just listen to it (right here on my blog—upper right).

Whether this is skewed or not by time and current perspective, what the song drew forth was the realization of my cowardice/failure in the face of life in those crucial years right after college.

Bike trip, Tahoe, San Diego, Australia, Southeast Asia. By the time I returned I was two years out of college. While in Australia I had applied to grad school back in the States, and since they gave me a free ride and a stipend, and it was in Boulder, I jumped at it. It was rewarding, Boulder was great, and I met Keely there. A “golden age” like I’ve said to many.

Still. In the height of my miserable reflections last year—with Hard Sun blaring on the headphones—I thought that I had taken the easy way out. Why?

Because grad school wasn’t that challenging, and even when it was challenging it was in a way to which I was accustomed. I had to find a difficult professor and fieldwork in Cuba to truly challenge me—and that challenge lay beyond academics. And when the Master’s was finished I had no desire to continue.

The challenge lay elsewhere and I avoided it: hard work for low pay in the outdoor industry with no approval. I had fallen in love with the West a few years earlier and had fallen in love with everything outdoors as well (my semester with NOLs was one of my life’s turning points). Living in Tahoe I lived as a ski bum, working as a chairlift operator and living with about ten people in a party chalet. That was for one winter. Then I turned towards the backpacker travel abroad experience rather than stay immersed in the West.

I just didn’t have it in me to live permanently as a ski bum, river rat, outdoor guide, whatever. I don’t know why, but I put it down to cowardice in the face of internalized societal and, by extension, familial pressure. It was much easier to go to grad school and take my vacation time to explore outdoors. Just notice that I had been drawn to the outdoor sports Mecca of the States, and in my first semester in school, loaded with courses and a teaching assistantship, I jumped on an evening class to get my Wilderness First Responder certification. And I keep doing this—looking for a compromise between my career and my passion. What a coward.

So how does this relate to Into the Wild? I see similarities in Chris McCandless and myself: both from upper-middle class families, both went to good, private universities; both fell in love with the West; both graduated in 1990 and then went out West. I kept going and ended up in California and then Australia and then on to Southeast Asia, before returning to the safety of a summer in Connecticut and grad school in the fall. He kept going too, but he went deeper with his intentions and experiences. Trust me, hitchhiking through the outback from Perth to Darwin or raving at full moon parties in Koh Samui is cool, but it’s not the same as isolation and survival in Alaska. I was skating along from one backpacker experience to another; he was trying to figure it all out.

I see that he didn’t take the easy way out (I’m not referring to his death here but the path he chose). And I wonder what might have been if I didn’t bow to the pressure I felt to do something I, and people from my socio-economic strata, thought acceptable. Everyone always knew I wouldn’t take a 9-5 office job, but bumming around the West, working just enough to get by and live free, well that wasn’t quite right. Somehow there had to be a semi-acceptable path: go to grad school and become a college professor. Well the first part happened but I imploded before the second. Thank God at least for that.

So I made a coward’s choice. The choice ended up being fulfilling and has led me on and on. I’ve spent ten out of the last twenty years abroad, with an impressive accumulation of adventures. Yet even now I still wish to work at a job that puts me outdoors 200 + days a year. Good luck on that one, Paul.

Wednesday, February 3, 2010

Skins--A recommendation

I am very much into the first season of Skins and so I recommend it to you all. We stream it on Netflix but if you have BBC America I guess you can find it there. Episode 2 is particularly good and a little brave stylistically. It's funny, can be "slapsticky," but is also heavy in the right places. And since it is a British show, without the hypocritical American puritanism, there is more realistic swearing, drinking and drug-use as befits older teens. Good stuff.

Saturday, January 30, 2010

Rainy Day in Charleston 2

Checking out Charleston and Lowcountry art



Rainy Day in Charleston

Cold gusts and heavy rains--perfect for doing something indoors. Keely and I visited the Gibbes Musuem of Art and then had an excellent lunch at 82 Queen. Normally we want to be out and about but the weather was bad enough that indoor action felt perfect.

What you'll see above--in separate posts--are just a few pictures. For the life of me I couldn't put all the pics in one post and make it look really good. I still have a long way in becoming adept at this blogging thing.

Friday, January 29, 2010

Thursday, January 28, 2010

Goodbye

Well a literary giant has passed. J.D. Salinger died at the ripe old age of 91. Although much of those years were lived in seclusion and no publishing output (but plenty of writing it is believed), his impact was enormous. Love or hate them, The Catcher in the Rye and "Nine Stories," were influential and Catcher still resonates. Read about him here.

Wednesday, January 27, 2010

Saturday, January 23, 2010

Song Obsessed

A lot of us become song obsessed from time to time. I've been obsessed with Let Down by Radiohead for over a month now. I became conscious of my obsession and started thinking of previous song obsessions, which led to me making a playlist that went on and on. There are currently 64 songs in the list and more may be added as my memory keeps bringing old obsessions to the fore.

Obsession comes from the Latin obsessus, meaning "besiege, occupy." Occupied by an idea, besieged by a persistent influence. That's cool. Music does it to me all the time.

I'm talking about playing a song all the time and singing it, and when you do those things you occupy a different reality. I'm not talking about song sung when very young, but music you hear from the radio or album and you are very conscious of it. Right now, my first memory of playing a song all the time involves the Help Me Rhonda. (Maybe I was in 5th or 6th grade).

I've chosen a few of my songs from past until now--less, I think, to share with you and more to just work out my memories. A life examined!

Help Me Rhonda: although important because of its primacy in my memory, it's more the fact that I liked and understood the lyrics. Understanding rock lyrics shows you ain't such a little kid anymore.

L.A. Woman (The Doors) and Going to California (Zepp) and Can't Stand Losing You (The Police) and The Message by Grandmaster Flash: all from 8th grade. See sentiment above about rock lyrics and intensify it.

Heroes by Bowie: first listened to in the eighties--Junior and Senior years in high school--and definitely tied to a great girlfriend and all those teen feelings of angst and romance.

Resposta by Skank: when I hear this song everything turns gold and I'm still living in Brasil. This is a great song from my favorite Brasilian rock band. It's a live version from an epic concert in Ouro Preto. I'm seen them live twice and the shows rank as top ten.

Bolero by Ravel: One of the songs to make me feel epic. I used to listen to this song quite a bit when running around Lagoa in Rio. It took my pace up so naturally and then I would cruise.

What I Got (Reprise) by Sublime: boy this one typifies the 90's for me. Lots of road tripping around Colorado with this on. 90's + Colorado = A Golden Age

Of course Loving Cup by the Rolling Stones: just see a previous post of mine.

Well, that’s it for now. Maybe more from the list later. Write in about a song you’ve become obsessed with, from whatever time of your life.

Wednesday, January 13, 2010

#MusicMonday: 50 Music Sites That Matter

#MusicMonday: 50 Music Sites That Matter

Posted using ShareThis

Work in Progress

Hey Everybody,
while I can use a computer and do some stuff, I am not that technically savvy, especially with regard to certain specifics of blog tech 101. I know some of you have had issues becoming followers, subscribers, posting comments, etc. hang with me! I'm learning as I go along and hopefully all will be right. Just keep reading, spread the word, and keep posting comments.

Thanks, I do appreciate you letting me bug you with my attempt at restarting the creativity and just observing life.

Paul

Monday, January 11, 2010

I wanted to share an article with you from The Economist called "The Others". Although the article takes liberties with some facts (philosophers abroad), sketches too broadly at times, and does not address much about the expat experience, I feel it at least tries to address the issues of being/feeling foreign. Having lived and traveled out of the U.S. for ten of the last twenty years it is something I know. Read the article and tell me what you think. Some comments I have to make:

The writer states, "It has long been true in America that nobody can be foreign because everyone is foreign." Well, we know this writer isn't American, since there has been and still is a clear fear of the foreigner here. Hell, natives down here in South Carolina consider other Americans to be foreigners sometimes. What he was really saying was that one doesn't feel like a foreigner in America (this was a compliment I think), because of immigration's affect on the country (historical and current). Of course the reference point must be NYC, because I guarantee you there are parts of this country that would make any urbane Brit from London feel downright foreign (once again, the state I now live in).

The writer also states, " To get a strong sense of what it means to be foreign, you have to go to Africa, the Middle East, or parts of Asia." No you don't. His perspective here is terribly limiting, yet I know what he means. He means the areas that are rough, isolated, or culturally resilient in the face of globalization. Obviously if you go to Cape Town or Jo-burg, Beirut or Istanbul you are in cosmopolitan cities, regardless of the fact that you are in Africa or the Middle East. Again, to pick on South Carolina, if you ended up in the most rural areas of this very rural state you would get a strong sense of what it means to be foreign, much more so than, say, a Japanese tourist visiting Cape Town.

With a topic like this broad strokes don't always do it.

Wednesday, January 6, 2010

Better than the Original?

Today I’m going for something light. Recently I was discussing music with a colleague of mine and we got into 80’s music. Luckily we were on the same wavelength about that decade: for a lot of reasons it sucked musically; and, if you listen to all the same old stuff people keep playing on 80’s Hits stations you keep hearing the worst of the decade. Anyway, I brought up New Order’s Love Vigilantes as a great song from a great band that was unfairly typecast. From there I told my friend about Iron & Wine’s new cover version and how I couldn’t decide which was better.

We all know great examples of cover versions that have been deemed better than, or at least equal to, the original song. I’ll jump in to this old argument, hoping that you comment with your picks.

I’m going to say that I vote a tie between New Order’s Love Vigilante and Iron & Wine’s very recent version. They are so different and both work. Laura Cantrell does a great version and others who cover the tune are Oysterband, Poi Dog Pondering, Hungry Lucy, and Jimmy Ryan. Give them a listen and tell me which you like and why.

All Along the Watchtower by Hendrix is a better version than Dylan’s original. Now wait, I wasn’t comparing Hendrix to Dylan, it’s about the song itself. As a rock song, Hendrix’s version is better.

Eva Cassidy’s version of Song Bird exceeds the impact of the Fleetwood original, but only for subtle reasons and in small degrees. And some might give me grief but I’m going with the Fugee’s Killing Me Softly over Roberta Flack’s original. I know “old school” style seems to be always better but I’ve had a wicked crush on Lauryn Hill and part of it is her earnest, smooth and sexy voice.

If you google any variation of “cover version better than original” tons of hits pop up. For example, The Website hearya has a list of 33 (http://www.hearya.com), where I think they hit some right and missed others. Example: No way is The Rolling Stones’ version of Just My Imagination better than the Temptations’ original. Mick and the boys can pull off all sorts of American styles and intonations but I don’t think they can match the smoothness of the Temptations.

But I do agree with hearya that the Foo Fighters version of Baker Street by Jerry Rafferty is much better. The energy is there, simple as that. And The Pogues And the Band Played Waltzing Matilda wins!

Your thoughts? Any song, any genre.

Monday, January 4, 2010

Andy Goldsworthy and the “Loving Cup”

I receive most of my inspiration from three sources: nature, books, and music. One usually takes center stage; for example, a novel that invades my thoughts for weeks and makes me see myself differently. This past summer saw a confluence of two sources: music and nature, although nature was mediated through the eyes of the artist Andy Goldsworthy. I could say it was a confluence of art and music, yet Goldsworthy’s art is so “true” to, and not abstracted from, nature that I’m going to go ahead and chalk up one for nature’s power to inspire.

In July, just weeks back from Tanzania, still weak from malaria, and settling into my new home in South Carolina, I found comfort from two sources that seem to fit perfectly: the documentary on Andy Goldsworthy, Rivers and Tides, and the song “Loving Cup” by the Rolling Stones.

Goldsworthy first.

I think my wife Keely found the documentary on Netflix when she was browsing for something to stream instantly. We put it on and I was hooked, and I would replay all or parts of the documentary all through the summer (and still to this day when I need a boost). The film follows the artist as he works in a variety of locations and with different materials. As well, Goldsworthy likes to talk of his work and the natural world in a way I will describe as rustic Scottish Zen (I know he’s English but he’s been living in Scotland for a while and the description just fits).

I don’t recall when I first became aware of Andy Goldsworthy and his art. It wasn’t long ago. I have a vague memory of seeing one of his coffee table books in Argumento bookstore in the neighborhood of Leblon in Rio de Janeiro—probably around 2004. Until that point I didn’t know he existed nor did I know that his type of art even existed. Goldsworthy’s art is brilliant, and detailed and textured. Most importantly, it looks right to me. It is the intersection of human craft and the natural world without pretense.

I have always loved human elements, found in the outdoors, that have been taken over by the cycles of nature—the New England stonewall that once bounded a colonial farm but now lays wrapped by a vibrant forest. I like to see the edges of control worn down. In the grounds of the Schönbrunn Palace in Vienna, Austria there lies the artesian well that gives the palace its name. In a place that is highly manicured, the original well—alcoved and bricked round—still maintains some small feel of flow. In the shaded area the trees and bushes are allowed a little more freedom and Greek statues are mossy and weathered.

Finding a wall or statue changed by nature seems to me to evoke a natural association between human art and nature. After all the materials did come from the earth, no matter how manipulated. And I see what Goldsworthy does as akin to nature’s working upon art. He recognizes the flow of time and the connection to nature as the canvas itself, and so his art emerges as simultaneously natural and crafted.

In the documentary he talks of time and of getting to know a place, and he truly evokes a pastoral feel. And this pastoralism, as I sense it, is Romantic even when acknowledging the dark, brutal aspects of the natural world.

Perhaps this pastoral feel is where I made an association with “Loving Cup.”

As for this song by the Stones, I’ve known it for some time; not decades, but I think I’ve owned Exile on Main Street for at least ten years or more. I did watch Scorsese’s Shine a Light last year or the year before and do remember Jack White joining the Stones for a rendition of the song. Maybe that stuck with me. Last year in Tanzania I had a colleague whose presence provoked me to revisit my listening to the Stones. Maybe that was the clincher.

I can’t put my finger on the reasons I started listening to “Loving Cup” as a single and why it stuck with me all summer. A year ago, Eddie Vedder’s “Hard Sun” dominated my thoughts—for valid reasons, but many of those reasons were hard also, full of self-doubt, midlife angst, and dangerous nostalgia about my twenties and paths I chose not to pursue. Vedder’s song has reflected many aspects of the way I’ve lived my life, but “Loving Cup” celebrates the way I can live my life.

Somewhere along my journey last summer, the Stones and Goldsworthy merged.

The footage of Goldsworthy, spending days and days outside toiling to produce art, matches the opening lines to the song: “I’m the man on the mountain, come on up/I’m the plowman in the valley with his face full of mud.”

Take a close look at the artist’s hands in the documentary and you see the hands that any stonemason would admire. He is a workingman. You see him in the fields collecting sheep’s wool that lies scattered and stuck to walls and bushes. Soon after, he will work hard to transform the raw material to art. He walks through his village picking tiny yellow flowers by the side of the road to then turn into a striking piece.

And Jagger sings, “I’m the man who walks the hillside in the sweet summer sun/I’m the man who brings you roses when you ain’t got none.”

The two together inspired me the way art is said to inspire—it lifted my spirits, it made me think, it made me look at the world differently, and it made me imagine.

And I need imagination, and I’m glad the dominant song this past year was “Loving Cup.”

“Oh what a beautiful buzz, what a beautiful buzz.” (Jagger and Richards)